Marketing Spark
All episodes
From Marketing Spark · May 9, 2023 · Louis Gudema

Brand marketing vs performance marketing: get the balance right

A founder I spoke with last quarter killed his brand budget after a board meeting and shifted every dollar to paid search. Six months later, customer acquisition costs were climbing and his sales team kept hearing the same line on cold calls: "Who are you again?" That's the brand marketing vs performance marketing trap, and it eats $5M-$20M B2B SaaS companies alive.

A founder I spoke with last quarter killed his brand budget after a board meeting and shifted every dollar to paid search. Six months later, customer acquisition costs were climbing and his sales team kept hearing the same line on cold calls: "Who are you again?" That's the brand marketing vs performance marketing trap, and it eats $5M-$20M B2B SaaS companies alive.

Drawn from Marketing Spark Episode 26 with Louis Gudema, fractional CMO and author of Bullseye Marketing.

Why the brand marketing vs performance marketing debate keeps coming back

Louis Gudema has spent decades inside B2B startups and growth-stage companies, mentors founders at MIT, and wrote Bullseye Marketing because he was tired of the noise. The second edition is focused exclusively on B2B, and the timing matters. Marketing budgets are tighter than they were in 2020 and 2021. Teams are smaller. And the first thing most CEOs cut when the air gets thin is brand.

That instinct feels rational. Brand is hard to measure this quarter. Performance ads spit out a cost per lead by Friday. So founders chase the dashboard. The problem, as Louis points out, is that the dashboard is lying to you about what's actually driving pipeline.

Scott Brinker's MarTech infographic had a few hundred companies in 2011. It now has more than 10,000. Every one of them sells you a dashboard, an attribution model, and a reason to optimize this week's campaign. The result is what Louis calls short-termism — a marketing culture that has forgotten the big idea and forgotten that David Ogilvy was right about most of what he wrote.

The Bullseye framework: three rings, in order

Bullseye Marketing has three stages and you start in the middle.

Ring one — your existing assets. Most companies are pouring marketing dollars into a leaky bucket. The website doesn't say what you do or why you're different. There are no conversion offers. You have 20,000 email contacts and you mail them at the holidays. Sales takes a week to follow up on a marketing-qualified lead. Louis told me about a $200M software company where the head of marketing admitted leads sat for a week or two before sales touched them. That's a dead lead. Fix the bucket first.

Ring two — intent. This is search ads, first-party intent signals from your site and email behaviour, and third-party data from Bombora or TechTarget. It's the most measurable ring. It's also the smallest. Only about 5% of your market is in-buying-mode at any given moment. The other 95% either don't care or have a vendor they're not looking to replace.

Ring three — brand and mental availability. This is the ring most B2B founders underinvest in, and Louis argues it's the most important over time. Mental availability is not awareness. It's whether your brand comes to mind the moment a buyer enters your category. And here's the number that should change how you think about it: in roughly half of B2B deals, the customer doesn't look at more than one or two vendors. If you've built mental availability, you walk into deals with no competition and a short sales cycle.

The Gusto proof point on why brand and performance need each other

The clearest case study Louis offers is Jalay Rizai, the CMO who grew Gusto from 500 to 50,000 customers. Her brand campaigns didn't generate trackable leads. They never do. But every time she paused brand spend, six months later her customer acquisition costs went through the roof and her lead-gen performance tanked.

She landed on a rule: at least 20% of budget on brand to support direct response. Most evidence outside Gusto points closer to a 50/50 split for mature programs. Either way, the principle holds — brand makes your performance marketing cheaper. Cut brand and you'll feel the pain about two quarters later, when nobody on your team will connect the dots back to the budget call you made in spring.

Louis shared his own version of this from when he was VP of business development at a marketing agency. His first call on the job was a prospect who said, "I've been following you for three years. I've seen your CEO talk, I read your blog, we're finally ready, let's talk." That deal closed easily. Not because Louis was a brilliant salesperson — because the brand work had been done years earlier. He calls these the dark market: deals you never knew you were in the running for, won before the buyer ever filled out a form.

ChatGPT for marketing didn't change the fundamentals

When ChatGPT hit, every marketer panicked and every consultant promised to rewrite your playbook. Louis pushes back hard on the panic.

He opens most of his talks with a slide of a book called Scientific Advertising, published in 1923. It sold millions of copies, top marketers still recommend it, and almost nothing in it is out of date. Marketing is understanding your customer, understanding your market, building products that benefit them, and communicating why in a way that makes them care. Channels change. Tools change. That work doesn't.

ChatGPT for marketing is, today, very good at accelerating the production of second-rate blog posts. It is not very good at understanding your customer, developing positioning, or building a brand worth remembering. Louis's point — and I agree with him — is that AI exposes weak marketing faster than it fixes it. If your strategy was thin before, ChatGPT just lets you produce thin content at scale. The marketers who win are still the ones who can do the strategic, emotional, hard-to-automate work.

There's also the arms-race problem. A LinkedIn post I saw a while back bragged about going from zero to 750,000 organic views by generating SEO content with AI. Impressive for now. But every competitor will arm themselves with the same tools within a year. When everyone is selling the same flavour of ice cream, the brand wins.

Why brand marketing and lead gen need different teams

The other point Louis makes that founders rarely hear: the people who do brand marketing well are not the people who do performance marketing well. The skill sets are genuinely different.

Lead-gen messaging is logical. 10% off. Download the white paper. Book the demo. You either click in the next ten seconds or you forget the ad existed.

Brand marketing is emotional. Characters, humour, situations. The reason you can still recall TV commercials from when you were a kid is that they were built to stick. Great B2B brand work does the same — it builds an association in the buyer's head that surfaces months or years later when they finally have a problem you solve. Trying to run both functions through the same person, or worse, the same agency brief, usually produces work that's bland in both directions.

People will think of your brand when they're ready to buy something in your category. From the research I've seen, probably half or more of deals, the customer does not look at more than one vendor, two at the most. If you have that top of mind position, if you've established that mental availability, you have a huge number of opportunities in which you have no competition and are very easy to close.

Louis Gudema

What this means for your company

If you're a $5M-$20M B2B SaaS founder reading this, three things to do this week.

  • Audit ring one before you spend another dollar on ads. Open your homepage on a phone. Does it say what you do and who it's for in plain English? Are there real conversion offers, or just "Book a demo"? When did you last email your house list? How long does sales take to call a lead?
  • Put a stake in the ground on brand budget. Even 20% is more than most lean teams allocate. Protect it from the next round of cuts. The Gusto pattern is real and you won't see the damage until two quarters after you make the call.
  • Stop asking ChatGPT to write your strategy. Use it for first drafts, summaries, research synthesis. Don't use it for positioning, customer understanding, or brand voice. Those are the parts of marketing that compound, and they're the parts you can't outsource to a model.

The marketing fundamentals haven't changed since 1923. Most companies still get them wrong. That's actually good news — it means founders who do the basics well still beat the ones running in circles with the latest tool.

If you want help getting the balance right

The Pipeline Story Sprint is built for exactly this problem — founder-led B2B SaaS companies between $5M and $20M who know their positioning, story, and homepage aren't pulling their weight, and who don't have time to figure it out alone. Ninety days, fixed scope, fixed price. See how the Sprint works.

Listen to the full conversation
The Fundamentals of Marketing: Branding, ChatGPT and Beyond

In this podcast episode, Mark, the host of "Marketing Spark," interviews Louis Gudema, author of "Bullseye Marketing" and fractional CMO for B2B startups and growth stage companies. 

Louis explains his unique approach to marketing and the Bullseye Marketing framework, which has received positive feedback from readers worldwide. 

Mark and Louis also discuss the process of writing a second edition of a book, the current state of the marketing landscape, and the effectiveness of brand marketing versus lead generation marketing. 

The conversation highlights the importance of brand and lead generation marketing while acknowledging the different skill sets required for each.