Marketing Spark
All episodes
From Marketing Spark · Apr 18, 2023 · Clay Ostrom

The Brand Positioning Framework Most B2B SaaS Founders Skip

Most founders I work with don't think they have a positioning problem. They think they have a website problem, or a sales cycle problem, or a lead-gen problem. They're wrong — and they usually figure it out the expensive way.

Most founders I work with don't think they have a positioning problem. They think they have a website problem, or a sales cycle problem, or a lead-gen problem. They're wrong — and they usually figure it out the expensive way.

Drawn from Marketing Spark Episode 74 with Clay Ostrom, founder of Map & Fire.

Why your bounce rate is really a positioning problem

From 2020 through early 2022, every B2B SaaS company looked like a genius. The rising tide carried the good companies and the crappy ones alike. Sloppy messaging? Didn't matter. Weak differentiation? Didn't matter. If you had a digital product and a working checkout, the leads showed up.

That market is gone. And founders are now staring at three symptoms that all trace back to the same cause: people bounce off the website in nine seconds, sales calls stretch from one conversation to three, and the pipeline looks busy but nothing closes. The instinct is to fix the symptom. Change the CTA color. Move the social proof above the fold. Embed a video. Hire another SDR.

That's why I sat down with Clay Ostrom of Map & Fire — someone who's spent years watching companies tweak pebbles while ignoring the boulder. The boulder is your positioning. If your positioning is off, none of the pebble-moving matters. You can A/B test your way into a slightly less broken version of the same problem, but you can't outrun it.

This piece walks through the brand positioning framework Clay uses with his clients, the specific symptoms that tell you it's time to stop tweaking, and the one diagnostic that catches the most dangerous version of bad positioning — the version where everything feels fine.

The "meh" trap: where most B2B SaaS companies actually live

Clay ran a survey of 100-plus business leaders and asked them to self-rate their brand, positioning, and messaging on a one-to-ten scale. He expected a normal distribution. What he got was telling.

Some people rated themselves nine or ten — fine, those are the confident ones. Some rated one to six — fine, those people know they have work to do. But the biggest cluster? Seven to eight. Pretty good. Solid enough. Nothing screaming red.

That's the dangerous bucket. Borrow the NPS logic for a second: nines and tens are promoters, ones to sixes are detractors, and sevens and eights count as nothing. They go in one ear and out the other. A seven-to-eight positioning is the same. It's not bad enough to force a conversation in the leadership team, but it's not sharp enough for a customer to remember you after they close the tab.

Clay calls it meh. I call it the "good enough" trap. Either way, it's the version of bad positioning that quietly limits how big you can get. You'll grow — slowly. You'll close deals — the easy ones. You'll show up in consideration sets — sometimes. But you'll never be the first name a buyer recalls when they describe what they need to a colleague.

If you're in the seven-to-eight zone, you don't have a marketing problem. You have a memorability problem, and no amount of homepage copywriting will fix it without going upstream.

The three-part brand positioning framework: customers, competition, offering

Clay's framework has three pieces, in this order: customers, competition, offering. The order matters.

Most founders start with the offering, because the offering is what they think about all day. That's a mistake. When you start with what you sell, every conversation about positioning becomes a conversation about features. You end up with a list of capabilities and a claim that you're "the leading platform for X" — which is what your three closest competitors also say.

Start with the customer. Specifically, start with the customer's needs separate from your offering. What are they actually trying to get done? What outcomes do they care about? What do they value when they're comparing options? Clay leans on two frameworks here that are worth knowing: Jobs to Be Done (people "hire" products to do a job) and the Bain Elements of Value (30 categories of what buyers actually care about, from cost reduction to risk reduction to social proof). Together they force you to describe the customer's world without your product in the frame.

Then look at the competition — and don't let any LinkedIn guru talk you out of this. The "just ignore your competitors" crowd is full of it. If you don't know how the competition positions itself, you're operating blind. Worse, if you finish your own positioning work and it sounds identical to your biggest competitor's homepage, you didn't actually position anything. You just wrote a brochure.

Only then do you go to the offering — and ask where it lines up with what customers value and where it diverges hardest from what competitors claim. That intersection is your position. Not a list of features. A specific place on a map of the buyer's brain.

How different is different enough? A Turkish towel story

One of the questions founders ask me constantly: how big does the differentiation actually need to be? Do I need to be radically different from every competitor, or is a small edge enough?

Clay's answer: as far apart as you can get, on the things customers actually care about. Think of it as planting your flag on the customer's mental map. The further your flag is from the competition's flag, the more likely you are to be remembered as a separate option instead of blurring into the category.

He gave a great example — and yes, it's a beach towel company, but stay with me, because the logic transfers cleanly to B2B SaaS. His client makes Turkish beach towels. The category is brutally commoditized. The market leader is SandCloud, which has built its position around variety: a million styles, IP partnerships with Disney, something for every personality.

Clay's client couldn't out-variety SandCloud and shouldn't have tried. So they did customer research and found two things. One, size mattered more than people admitted — buyers wanted a big, luxurious towel. The client's towels were 20% bigger than the standard. Two, customers were quietly tired of busy designs and wanted something elegant they'd be proud to hang in their bathroom. The client made classic, single-color Turkish towels with simple stripes.

So the positioning got built around two things: bigger and elegant. Not ten claims. Two. The 20% size advantage isn't earth-shattering on paper, but it's specific, it's testable, and it's something a customer can repeat to a friend in one sentence. That last part is the test.

The deliverable nobody talks about: confidence

When founders pay for positioning work, they want to know what shows up at the end. A document? A slide deck? A new homepage headline? Yes, all of those — Clay's process produces a positioning guidebook, a core messaging set, and the headline that should sit on your website. I do the same.

But the real deliverable is something neither of us puts on the invoice, because the CFO would laugh: confidence. When a CRO walks into a sales call believing the story, the call goes differently. When a marketing lead can finally articulate what the company does in one sentence, internal alignment stops being a quarterly initiative. When a founder hears a customer repeat their positioning back to them at a conference, the whole company gets faster.

Confidence doesn't get put down in our deliverable list. Maybe it should be. When everybody's united around a position and a story, it makes a huge difference. I was just working with a marketing lead in the IT space, and after the customer research and the positioning work, she felt empowered to tell a compelling story to clients. That can go so far — most people inside a company aren't the founder. They need the internal story to believe in.

Clay Ostrom

I had a CRO recently who started field-testing positioning language at conferences before we'd even finished the engagement. He couldn't help himself. The story resonated, prospects leaned in, and he kept iterating live. That's the signal. The qualitative tell — are they leaning in, are they smiling, are they asking follow-up questions — beats any dashboard metric in the first 90 days after a positioning shift.

What this means for your company this week

If you're a founder of a $5M-$20M B2B SaaS company and any of this is landing, here's the diagnostic to run this week:

  • Self-rate one to ten. Where does your positioning honestly sit? If you said seven or eight, that's the answer. You're in the meh trap.
  • Find five recent sales calls. Did the rep have to explain what you do more than once? Did the prospect ask "so how are you different from [competitor]" — and did the rep have a clean answer? If not, the boulder is in the way.
  • Open your homepage and your top three competitors' homepages in tabs. Cover the logos. Can you tell which is which? If you can't, neither can your buyers.
  • Pick the two things you want to be remembered for. Not ten. Two. They should be things customers actually value and things competitors don't credibly claim. If you can't name them in under a minute, that's the work.

None of this is fast. Positioning is a slower burn than an ad campaign, and the ROI shows up in shorter sales cycles, lower bounce rates, and a sales team that sounds like one company instead of seven. But the move that pays back the most is going upstream — fixing the boulder before you keep rearranging pebbles.

Ready to fix the boulder?

If your positioning is the bottleneck, and you're a founder running a $5M-$20M B2B SaaS company, the Pipeline Story Sprint covers exactly this in 90 days — positioning, story, homepage, and the marketing plan that runs off them. Fixed scope, fixed price, no fractional CMO retainer. Reach out if it sounds like the right next step.

Listen to the full conversation
A Deep Dive into the Power of Brand Positioning

In this episode of Marketing Spark, Mark Evans and Clay Ostrom discuss the importance of brand positioning and how it applies to marketing, sales, HR, product development, and raising capital.

We explore how positioning is about finding a unique place in the market and creating a memorable connection with customers.

We talk about the importance of clear and effective positioning in order to stand out in a competitive market and avoid being lost in the crowd.

We also discuss improving a company's positioning, including understanding customers, analyzing competition, and developing an offering that aligns with customer needs.

We also touch upon the key deliverables of the brand positioning process and how to measure the ROI of the work done.